Midland Alan 42 Multi Modifications

****** C - What If You Do not Love Grand Brother

Bologna, 146gg.

Long story short : tutto cominciò con un presunto caso di plagio. Tale Maria Antonietta Pinna accusò la sua correlatrice di laurea, tale dottoressa Miriam Turrini, di aver copiato copiose parti della sua tesi di laurea per scrivere un saggio. The Turrini says no, the Pinna says yes, legal casino: up to far so good, we hope that we can reach a key to the problem, he knows those who copy or who defames, greetings cards, over there.
Then, the blog on the novel published two posts about the story, given that the alleged plagiarized Pinna is a collaboration of the above. And so far, so good: the news spread, people share it, someone puts it in some publication, we hope that we can reach a clue eccettera so wishes, over there.
Then, one day, Google complaint the two posts on the novel . Why? Because I told the Police Stato, Compartimento Emilia Romagna, sezione Ferrara. E perchè la Polizia di Stato, Compartimento Emilia Romagna, sezione Ferrara, ha detto a Google di censurare i due post di Sul Romanzo ?
Per via di una "richiesta di accertamenti. Per indagini in corso la Polizia di Stato chiede a Google di cancellare due post (26 febbraio 2010 e 3 marzo 2010) perché v’è un reato di cui all’art. 595 del Codice Penale per diffamazione con pubblicazione di articoli postati sul sito internet www.sulromanzo.blogspot.com."
Per orientarvi meglio, ecco un paio di indicazioni:
Il primo dei post censurati, che pare tornato visibile quasi definitivamente ,
L'articolo published by the novel in relation to the complaint ,
Another article about it on Writer's Dream, site for new writers.
judge. But first, and I quote WD because they told the good, simple, simple

This is a serious infringement of Article. 21 of the Italian Constitution. A key article, which reads as follows:

Article 21.
Everyone has the right to freely express their thoughts in speech, writing or any other means of communication.
The press can not be subjected to authorization or censorship.
You can only Seizure by a reasoned judicial authority in the case of offenses for which the press law expressly authorizes, or in case of violation of the rules prescribed by law for the claim of responsibility.
In such cases, when there is absolute urgency and the timely intervention of the judiciary, the seizure of the press can be run from police officers, who must immediately, and never within twenty-four hours, report to 'judicial authority.
If this does not confirm the twenty-four hours, the seizure is understood to be withdrawn and null and void.

The libel not one of the cases involving the seizure.

It seemed a nice thing to say about. And even on your part, spread the word would not be bad. Why
, leaving aside the matter, the crux of the problem is simple: censor a post for questioning is illibertario. Then judge for yourself.

PS: Thank on the novel and WD for reporting, and I hope I do not want in reporting the news if I copied some of them, and if my article is just a glimpse on the issue - to deepen just, well, a little googling '.

now I'm going to work, because if not visit the crossroads, at least for a while ', after reading this stuff, it's time we stay dry.
you have a look at what surrounds you - but do not look too strong .
they could hear you.